De la idea al modelo estructural: Investigación conceptual en ciencias de la administración

Autores/as

Juan Mejía-Trejo
Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-1943

Palabras clave:

investigación conceptual, ciencias de la administración, SEM, PLS-SEM

Sinopsis

De la idea al modelo estructural: Investigación conceptual en ciencias de la administración es una obra metodológica que guía al investigador para transformar una idea inicial en un modelo estructural defendible, especialmente bajo la lógica SEM/PLS-SEM. El libro explica cómo pasar del tema al fenómeno investigable, del problema a la pregunta estructural, de la teoría a las variables, y de los conceptos a constructos medibles con indicadores, hipótesis y criterios de evaluación. Su aporte central es mostrar que un modelo SEM no inicia en el software, sino en una arquitectura conceptual sólida, coherente y metodológicamente viable.

También presenta una ruta progresiva en siete capítulos: delimitación de la idea, construcción del sistema conceptual, formulación de variables e hipótesis, operacionalización de constructos, evaluación del modelo de medición, análisis estructural avanzado y conversión del modelo en tesis, artículo, capítulo o informe académico.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Juan Mejía-Trejo, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México

Profesor Investigador Titular en la Universidad de Guadalajara, México.

Citas

Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001

Bem, D. J. (2004). Writing the empirical journal article. En J. M. Darley, M. P. Zanna, & H. L. Roediger III (Eds.), The compleat academic: A career guide (2nd ed., pp. 185–219). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10726-008

Cepeda-Carrion, G., Nitzl, C., & Roldán, J. L. (2017). Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: Guidelines and empirical examples. En H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 173–195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_8

Cheah, J.-H., Nitzl, C., Roldán, J. L., Cepeda-Carrion, G., & Gudergan, S. P. (2021). A primer on the conditional mediation analysis in PLS-SEM. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 52(SI), 43–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505639.3505645

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. En G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311766005_The_Partial_Least_Squares_ Approach_to_Structural_Equation_Modeling

Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. https://nguyenthanhphuong.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Churchill-1979.pdf

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~schaller/528Readings/Cohen1992.pdf

Colquitt, J. A., & George, G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ—Part 1: Topic choice. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 432–435. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61965960

Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12– 32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486

Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277 https://statmath.wu.ac.at/courses/r-se-mbr/dl/M1b_Diamantopoulos_2001.pdf

Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent partial least squares path modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.02

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, Article 7. https://cits.tamiu.edu/kock/nedwebarticles/gefenetal2000.pdf

Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510. https://parsmodir.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/green1991.pdf

Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742

Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012

Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127–142. PDF: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/200118/

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

https://htw.oil.com.tw/web/cycuim/phd/asset/phd09/Romi_2019_Hairetal_EBR_PLS-SEM.pdf

Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683

Henseler, J. (2017). Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178–192. PDF: https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/6995998/2017_JA_Henseler.pdf

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135.: https://run.unl.pt/server/api/core/bitstreams/d124ea66-0ba4-4c13-a658- af460fbce714/content

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2014-0304

Hult, G. T. M., Hair, J. F., Jr., Proksch, D., Sarstedt, M., Pinkwart, A., & Ringle, C. M. (2018). Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3), 1–21.

https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.17.0151

Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218. https://statmath.wu.ac.at/courses/r-se- mbr/dl/M1c_Jarvis_Mackenzie_Podsakoff_2003.pdf

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://cits.tamiu.edu/kock/pubs/journals/2015JournalIJeC_CommMethBias/Kock_2 015_IJeC_CommonMethodBiasPLS.pdf

Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://cits.tamiu.edu/kock/pubs/journals/2018/Kock_Hadaya_2018_ISJ_SampleSiz ePLS.pdf

Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance- based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302

Mejía-Trejo, J. (2023). Diseño de cuestionarios para la creación de escalas en las ciencias sociales: Uso del análisis factorial exploratorio (SPSS) y confirmatorio (EQS). AMIDI. ISBN 978-607-59397-6-6. https://amidibiblioteca.amidi.mx/index.php/AB/catalog/book/49

Nitzl, C., Roldán, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1849– 1864. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302

Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11, 17–61. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721- 040030

Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332–344.

https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2009/2009-44.pdf

Richter, N. F., Schubring, S., Hauff, S., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2020). When predictors of outcomes are necessary: Guidelines for the combined use of PLS- SEM and NCA. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2243–2267.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2019-0638

Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor’s comments: A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), iii–xiv. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410402

Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449

Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Jr., Cheah, J.-H., Becker, J.-M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian Marketing Journal, 27(3), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2019.05.003

Sarstedt, M., Richter, N. F., Hauff, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2024). Combined importance– performance map analysis (cIPMA) in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS–SEM): A SmartPLS 4 tutorial. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(4), 746–760. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-024-00325-y

Schuberth, F., Rademaker, M. E., & Henseler, J. (2020). Estimating and assessing second-order constructs using PLS-PM: The case of composites of composites. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2211–2241. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0642

Shmueli, G. (2010). To explain or to predict? Statistical Science, 25(3), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-STS330 PDF: https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~aldous/157/Papers/shmueli.pdf

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189

Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371

De la idea al modelo estructural: Investigación conceptual en ciencias de la administración

Descargas

Publicado

junio 1, 2026

Licencia

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Detalles sobre el formato de publicación disponible: PDF

PDF

ISBN-13 (15)

978-970-96061-3-3

doi

10.55965/abib.9789709606133