Análisis cualitativo en las ciencias de la administración
Palabras clave:
análisis cualitativo, ciencias de la administraciónSinopsis
Las ciencias de la administración enfrentan hoy retos analíticos de elevada complejidad derivados de la transformación digital, la heterogeneidad organizacional y la centralidad del conocimiento como recurso estratégico intangible. En este escenario, los enfoques lineales y exclusivamente cuantitativos resultan insuficientes para comprender la dinámica real de las organizaciones, caracterizada por procesos no lineales, relaciones simbólicas y prácticas socialmente construidas.
El análisis cualitativo se vuelve, por tanto, indispensable para interpretar significados, discursos, rutinas, experiencias y relaciones de poder que configuran la acción organizacional, por lo que la presente obra ofrece un abrodaje de las principales técnicas, tales como:
El Capítulo 1 introduce los fundamentos del análisis cualitativo, abordando sus principios epistemológicos, los tipos y enfoques de investigación cualitativa, las técnicas de recolección de datos y el proceso de codificación como núcleo del análisis. Se enfatiza la naturaleza interpretativa, recursiva y contextual del análisis cualitativo, sentando las bases conceptuales que atraviesan toda la obra.
El Capítulo 2 se centra en la Teoría Fundamentada (Grounded Theory), examinando sus orígenes clásicos, sus fundamentos filosóficos y sus desarrollos contemporáneos. Se analizan sus procedimientos analíticos, sus principales variante—clásica, constructivista y realista crítica— y su potencial para generar teoría sustantiva directamente a partir de los datos organizacionales.
El Capítulo 3 aborda el análisis temático como una estrategia flexible para la identificación y sistematización de patrones de significado. Se describen sus fases, criterios de rigor, ventajas y limitaciones, así como su articulación con otros enfoques cualitativos, mostrando su utilidad para la construcción de modelos conceptuales en el ámbito administrativo.
El Capítulo 4 desarrolla el análisis del discurso como enfoque para comprender cómo el lenguaje construye realidades organizacionales, identidades, legitimidades y relaciones de poder. Se examinan sus principales corrientes y aplicaciones en áreas como la estrategia, la cultura organizacional y la transformación digital.
El Capítulo 5 presenta la teoría de la argumentación como herramienta analítica para examinar procesos de decisión, persuasión, negociación y conflicto en contextos
administrativos, destacando su valor para el análisis crítico de discursos organizacionales.
El Capítulo 6 analiza el enfoque del análisis de contenido, tanto cualitativo como cuantitativo, subrayando su utilidad para el estudio sistemático de documentos, textos estratégicos y narrativas organizacionales, así como su integración con software de análisis cualitativo.
El Capítulo 7 explora el estudio de caso como estrategia de investigación en profundidad, abordando su diseño metodológico, criterios de rigor y potencial para comprender fenómenos organizacionales complejos en contextos reales.
El Capítulo 8 introduce la etnografía como método para el análisis de la cultura organizacional, las prácticas cotidianas y las dinámicas simbólicas, enfatizando su pertinencia en entornos organizacionales híbridos y digitales.
El Capítulo 9 desarrolla la hermenéutica como enfoque interpretativo centrado en la comprensión del sentido y la experiencia vivida, aplicándola al liderazgo, la ética y los procesos de cambio organizacional.
El Capítulo 10 se dedica a la entrevista como técnica central de la investigación cualitativa, analizando sus sesgos, transformaciones tecnológicas y aplicaciones estratégicas en la gestión del talento y la toma de decisiones.
Finalmente, el Capítulo 11 aborda la investigación-acción como enfoque participativo, ético y transformador, destacando su potencial para articular teoría administrativa y práctica organizacional orientada al cambio y la mejora continua.
Como reflexión final integrtadora Las ciencias de la administración enfrentan, en el contexto contemporáneo, desafíos analíticos derivados de la creciente complejidad organizacional, la transformación digital y la centralidad del conocimiento como recurso estratégico intangible. Las organizaciones ya no pueden ser comprendidas únicamente mediante modelos lineales o aproximaciones basadas en la medición de variables aisladas, dado que su funcionamiento real está atravesado por significados, interpretaciones, relaciones simbólicas, dinámicas de poder y procesos sociales situados. En este escenario, el análisis cualitativo se consolida como un enfoque indispensable para comprender la acción organizacional en su profundidad y complejidad.
El análisis cualitativo permite explorar cómo los actores organizacionales construyen sentido, interpretan normas, negocian decisiones y configuran prácticas
cotidianas en contextos específicos. A diferencia de los enfoques cuantitativos, que privilegian la generalización estadística, el análisis cualitativo aporta una comprensión contextual, procesual y relacional de los fenómenos administrativos. Esta perspectiva resulta particularmente relevante para estudiar dimensiones como la cultura organizacional, el liderazgo, la estrategia, la innovación, la ética, el cambio organizacional y la toma de decisiones, donde los significados y discursos desempeñan un papel central.
Las posibilidades del análisis cualitativo en las ciencias de la administración son amplias y diversas. Enfoques como la teoría fundamentada permiten generar teoría sustantiva a partir de los datos empíricos; el análisis temático facilita la identificación de patrones de significado transversales; el análisis del discurso permite examinar cómo el lenguaje construye realidades organizacionales y legitimidades; mientras que el estudio de caso y la etnografía posibilitan comprender fenómenos complejos en contextos reales y dinámicos. Esta pluralidad metodológica ofrece al investigador flexibilidad analítica y una mayor adecuación entre las preguntas de investigación y las estrategias de indagación.
En consecuencia, el análisis cualitativo no solo incrementa el rigor interpretativo de la investigación administrativa, sino que amplía su capacidad explicativa y crítica. Al permitir comprender las organizaciones desde la perspectiva de los actores y en sus contextos específicos, el análisis cualitativo fortalece el papel de las ciencias de la administración como disciplinas orientadas no solo a la eficiencia, sino también a la comprensión, la reflexión ética y la transformación organizacional.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Abma TA, Broerse JE. Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):160-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x. PMID: 20536537; PMCID: PMC5060528. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20536537/
Al-Eisawi, D. (2022). A design framework for novices using grounded theory methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221113551
Agosta, L. (2010). Empathy in the context of philosophy (p. 20). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9780230275249
Aguirre Baztán, A. (1993). Etnografía: Metodología cualitativa en investigación sociocultural (2.ª ed.). Marcombo. https://etnografiafuac.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/aguirre-baztc3a1n-etnografc3ada.pdf
Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. https://lin-yu.me/books/AGRESTI_categorical_data_analysis_2nd.pdf
Alnsour MA.(2022). Using modified grounded theory for conducting systematic research study on the sustainable project management field. MethodsX. 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36385919/
Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using diaries for social research. SAGE Publications. https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781847877284_A24197374/preview-9781847877284_A24197374.pdf
Alejandro, A., y Zhao, L. (2023). Análisis cualitativo multimétodo de texto y discurso: un marco metodológico. Qualitative Inquiry , 30 (6), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231184421 (Obra original publicada en 2024)
Alexy, R. (2009). A theory of legal argumentation: The theory of rational discourse as theory of legal justification (R. Adler & N. MacCormick, Trans.). Oxford University Press.https://gc.scalahed.com/recursos/files/r161r/w24802w/Argumentacion_Juridica/Teoria_de_la_argumentacion.pdf
Aldiabat, K. M., & Le Navenec, C.-L. (2011). Philosophical roots of classical grounded theory: Its foundations in symbolic interactionism. The Qualitative Report, 16(4), 1063–1080. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1121
Allan, G. (2003). A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 2(1), 1–10. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejbrm/article/view/1168
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Prentice Hall. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-07223-000
Anderson, G. L. (1990). Fundamentals of educational research. Falmer Press. https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofed00ande
Angrosino, M. V. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. SAGE Publications. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/preview/doing-ethnographic-and-observational-research.pdf#_
Annamalah, S., et al. (2025). Exploring the relevance and rigour of case study research in business. Journal of Strategic Research. https://sustainability.hapres.com/htmls/JSR_1730_Detail.html?utm_source=chatgpt .com
Antropología Online. (2007, 10 octubre). Etnografía y Ciencia Social. Consultado el 20251103 de: https://antropologia-online.blogspot.com/2007/10/etnografa-y-ciencia-social.html
Aranda, A. M., Sele, K., Etchanchu, H., Guyt, J. Y., & Vaara, E. (2021). From big data to rich theory: Integrating critical discourse analysis with structural topic modelling. European Management Review, 18(3), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12452
Aristóteles. (2014). Retórica: Introducción, traducción y notas de Alberto Bernabé (Colección Clásicos de Grecia y Roma). Alianza Editorial. https://cristoraul.org/SPANISH/sala-de-lectura/BIBLIOTECATERCERMILENIO/CLASICOS/ARISTÓTELES/Aristóteles-Rétorica.pdf
Arnoux, E. (2019). El análisis del discurso como campo académico y práctica interpretativa. En O. I. Londoño Zapata & G. Olave
Arias (Eds.), Métodos de análisis del discurso: Perspectivas argentinas. Ediciones de la U.https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/soprag-2020-0010/html?srsltid=AfmBOoqOhmcqBRCDHhmMrVxSBt4h-oTUF73KGYMayJ2PR4tqAhvJHdt2
ATLAS.ti Research Hub (2024). What is life history research?. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/life-history-research
ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. (2025). ATLAS.ti 25 Mac – Manual de usuario (v. 25.0.0). Berlín.https://manuals.atlasti.com/Mac/es/manual/ATLAS.ti_Manual_es_Mac.pdf
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
Banks, M., & Ruby, J. (Eds.). (2011). Made to be seen: Perspectives on the history of visual anthropology. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo11081971.html
Beaugrande, R. de, & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. https://parhamti.com/wpcontent/uploads/2023/07/Introduction-to-Text-Linguistics.pdf
Bendien, E., Groot, B., & Abma, T. (2022). Circles of impacts within and beyond participatory action research with older people. Ageing & Society, 42(5), 1014-1034. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20001336
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research (p. 18). Free Press. https://archive.org/details/contentanalysisi0000bern
Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Analyzing_Qualitative_Data.html?id=yAi1DAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Beuchot, M. (1997). Tratado de hermenéutica analógica: Hacia un nuevo modelo de interpretación. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.https://www.libros.unam.mx/tratado-de-hermeneutica-analogica-hacia-un-nuevo- modelo-de-interpretacion-9786073057790-ebook.html
Bizjak, D. (2020). The role of discourse and text in the construction of organizational identity. PuntOorg International Journal, 5(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.19245/25.05.pij.5.2.1
Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Bolívar Botía, A. (2002). “¿De nobis ipsis silemus? Epistemología de la investigación biográfica-narrativa en educación”. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 4(1), 1–26. https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/49
Botelle, R., & Willott, C. (2020). Nacimiento, actitudes y placentofagia: un análisis temático del discurso de las discusiones en foros de crianza del Reino Unido. BMC Embarazo y Parto, 20, 1–10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32138706/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Análisis temático. En Manual de métodos de investigación en psicología de la APA (Vol. 2, pp. 57–71). https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners (1ª ed.). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/successful-qualitative-research/book233059 us.sagepub.com
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). Cómo utilizar el análisis temático con datos de entrevistas. En A. Vossler & N. Möller (Eds.), The Counselling & Psychotherapy Research Handbook (pp. 183-197). SAGE. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269930724_How_to_use_thematic_analysis_with_interview_data
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1195588
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Terry, G. (2019). Thematic Analysis. In: Liamputtong, P. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmática Sociocultural, 1(2), 334–357. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/CRITICAL-DISCOURSE-ANALYSIS-AND-ITS-CRITICSBreeze/abb4c2bc541c72eae8f61c10d621e161413a91bf
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://ktpu.kpi.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/social-research-methods-alan-bryman.pdf
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607941
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Métodos de investigación empresarial (3.ª ed.). Cambridge, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-958340-9. OCLC 746155102.https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Business_Research_Methods_3e.html?i d=Dw1wbwAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-08155-000
Bunge, M. (2007). Diccionario de filosofía (p. 96). Madrid: Siglo XXI Editores.https://padron.entretemas.com.ve/cursos/Epistem/Diccionarios/Bunge_DiccFfia.pdf
CAQDAS Networking Project. (2024). AI tools for QDA. University of Surrey. https://www.surrey.ac.uk/computer-assisted-qualitative-data-analysis/qual-ai/ai-tools-qda
Calsamiglia, H., & Tusón, A. (1999). Las cosas del decir: Manual de análisis del discurso. Ariel.https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=LJV0CgAAQBAJ
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin. https://www.sfu.ca/~palys/Campbell&Stanley-1959- Exptl&QuasiExptlDesignsForResearch.pdf
Cárdenas, B. (2017). Los comienzos de la etnología en México y el Museo Nacional. Cuicuilco: Revista de Ciencias Antropológicas, 24(68), 77–100. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.
https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448- 84882017000100077
Carney, T. F. (1971). Content Analysis: A Review Essay. Historical Methods Newsletter, 4(2), 52–61.https://doi.org/10.1080/00182494.1971.10593939
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE. https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=y0ooAwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Charmaz, Kathy & Keller, Reiner (2016). A Personal Journey with Grounded Theory Methodology. Kathy Charmaz inm Conversation With Reiner Keller [60 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(1), Art. 16, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1601165.
Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. J. (2020). Participatory action research: Theory and methods for engaged inquiry (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033268
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20716027
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_311
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2018). Using thematic analysis in counselling and psychotherapy research: A critical reflection. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 18(2), 107-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12165
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-18109-000
Conway, M. (2006). The subjective precision of computers: A methodological comparison with human coding in content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 186-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900608300112
Cotán Fernández, A. (2020). El enfoque etnográfico en la investigación educativa: aproximaciones y reflexiones metodológicas. Universidad de Sevilla. https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/101238
Crabtree, B. F. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Doing_Qualitative_Research.html?id=M Ed2AwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Creswell, J. (1994). Diseño de investigación: Enfoques cualitativos y cuantitativos. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. ISBN 978-0-8039-5255-3. https://academia.utp.edu.co/seminario-investigacion- II/files/2017/08/INVESTIGACION CUALITATIVACreswell.pdf
Creswell, J. (2008). Diseño de investigación: enfoques cualitativos, cuantitativos y mixtos . Sage.https://academia.utp.edu.co/seminario-investigacion-II/files/2017/08/INVESTIGACION-CUALITATIVACreswell.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://cae.americananthro.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Coffey_Amanda_Atkinson_PaulMaking_Sense_of_Qualitative_Data.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2155979
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the croyresearch process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://seminariodemetodologiadelainvestigacion.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/thefoundations-of-social-research-meaning-and-perspective-in-the-research-process-michael-crotty.pdf
Dahlberg K, Todres L, Galvin K. (2009).Lifeworld-led healthcare is more than patient- led care: an existential view of well-being. Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Aug;12(3):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9174-7. Epub 2008 Dec 20. PMID: 19101822. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19101822/
Jeanne; Kellehear, Allan; Gliksman, Michael (1997). El investigador en salud pública: Un enfoque metodológico . Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press . pp. 611–618 . ISBN 978-0195540758. https://www.amazon.com.mx/Public-Health-Researcher-Methodological-Guide/dp/0195540751
Dapkus, M. (1985). A thematic analysis of the experience of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(2), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.408
Delfico, J. F. (1996). Content analysis: A methodology for structuring and analyzing written material (pp. 19–21) [PDF]. United States General Accounting Office. https://www.gao.gov/assets/pemd-10.3.1.pdf
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07735-000
DeSantis L.& Ugarriza DN.(200) The Concept of Theme as Used in Qualitative Nursing Research. Western Journal of Nursing Research.;22(3):351-372. doi:10.1177/019394590002200308
Díaz, D. (1978). Metodología cualitativa en las ciencias sociales. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Dilthey, W. (1989). El mundo histórico (E. Ímaz, Ed., pp. 321–344). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.https://archive.org/details/wilhelm-dilthey-el-mundo-historico
Döring, N., & Walter, R. (2022). Iconography of child sexual abuse in the news (justice and crime reporting). DOCA – Database of Variables for Content Analysis. https://doi.org/10.34778/2zu
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810190
Dutilh-Novaes, C. (2021). Argument and argumentation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/argument/
Dźwigoł, H. (2023). Case Studies as a Research Method in Management Science. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology – Organization and Management Series, (180). https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.180.6
Eliade, M. (1978). La nostalgie des origines: Méthodologie et histoire des religions [en francés] (p. 116). Paris, France: Gallimard.https://monoskop.org/File:Eliade_Mircea_La_nostalgie_des_origines_1971.pdf
Eliade, M. (2014). Lo sagrado y lo profano. Barcelona, España: Ediciones Paidós. ISBN 978-84-493-2983-8.https://web.seducoahuila.gob.mx/biblioweb/upload/Eliade,%20Mircea%20-%20Lo%20Profano%20Y%20Lo%20Sagrado.pdf
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo12182616.html
Enciclopedia Herder. Consultado el 20251102, de: https://encyclopaedia.herdereditorial.com/wiki/P%c3%a1gina_principal
Esau, K. (2021). Hate speech (Hate Speech/Incivility). DOCA - Database of Variables for Content Analysis, 1(5). https://www.hope.uzh.ch/doca/article/view/5a
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=discourse-and-social-change--9780745612188
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
Fairhurst, G. T. (2011). The power of framing: Creating the language of leadership. Jossey-B. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/The_Power_of_Framing.html?id=tPR4sSnciHwC&redir_esc=y
Fairhurst, G. T., & Connaughton, S. L. (2021). Leadership communication: Argumentation, narrative, and meaning-making. Leadership, 17(2), 224–245. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3923181
Fath, S., & Pisani, R. P. (2023). Encouraging self-blinding in hiring. Journal of Business and Psychology, (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607231192721
Feekery, A. (2024). The 7 C’s framework for participatory action research: A primer for early-career researchers. Action Research, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2234417
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. http://repo.darmajaya.ac.id/5678/1/Discovering%20Statistics%20Using%20IBM%20SPSS%20Statistics%20(%20PDFDrive%20).pdf
Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/enus/nam/computer-analysis-and-qualitative-research/book204803?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Figueroa, J. G., González, E. G., & Solís, V. M. (1981). Una aproxomación al problema del significado: Las redes semánticas [An approximation of the problem of meaning: The semantic systems]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 13(3), 447–458.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1982-20308-001
Finlay, KA, Hearn, JH and Chater, A (2021) Grieving a disrupted biography: an interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring barriers to the use of mindfulness after neurological injury or impairment. BMC Psychology, 9 (1). 124https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/628308/1/Finlay%20et%20al%20%282021%29.pdf
Fisher, M. (2021). Charting the future of business and organizational ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 10(3), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-10-2021-088
Fletcher-Watson, B. (2013). Toward a Grounded Dramaturgy: Using Grounded Theory to Interrogate Performance Practices in Theatre for Early Years. Youth Theatre Journal, 27(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929092.2013.837706
Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. WorldCat+3Google Books+3Sage Publications+3
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., … Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI. https://sigloxxieditores.com.mx/libro/pedagogia-del-oprimido-2/
Friese, S. (2020). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716641
Friese, S. (2020). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716641
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: https://monoskop.org/images/9/90/Foucault_Michel_Archaeology_of_Knowledge.p df
Frey, B. B. (2018). Content analysis. Sage. https://methods.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/sage-encyclopedia-of-educational-research-measurement-evaluation/toc#_
Fugard, A. J. B., & Potts, H. W. W. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: a quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 669–684.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed.). Continuum. https://web.mit.edu/kaclark/www/gadamer_truth_and_method.pdf
Gale, N.K., Heath, G., Cameron, E. et al. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol 13, 117 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Creative-Explorations-New-Approaches-to-Identities-andAudiences/Gauntlett/p/book/9780415396592
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/geertz.pdf
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203772157
Gibbs, G. R. (2010, June 19). Elementos básicos, parte 2: Teoría fundamentada [Video]. YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SZDTp3_New
Giddens, A. (2006). Sociología (5.ª ed., J. F. Tezanos, Trad.). Alianza Editorial.https://ifdc6m-juj.infd.edu.ar/aula/archivos/repositorio/0/140/Giddens-Sociologia.pdf
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-17646-000
Given, L.M.(2008).La enciclopedia SAGE de métodos de investigación cualitativa https://methods.sagepub.com/ency/edvol/sage-encyc-qualitative-research-methods/toc#_
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity : Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press. books.google.com+1
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1873899
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues & discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Doing_Grounded_Theory.html?id=XStmQgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press.https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/The_Grounded_Theory_Perspective.html?id=XUbZQAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965).Awareness of Dying. Transactiuons Publishers:https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Awareness_Of_Dying.html?id=iGF4TtBs VuQC&redir_esc=y
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203793206/discovery-grounded-theory-barney-glaser-anselm-strauss
Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2021). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/29095/1/Frederick%20J%20Gravetter_2017.pdf
Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?id=3GM nAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Grimes, S. (2008). Datos no estructurados y la regla del 80 por ciento.https://web.archive.org/web/20140912214503/http://breakthroughanalysis.com/2008/08/01/unstructured-data-and-the-80percent-rule/
Grimmer, J., & Stewart, B. M. (2013). Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for politicaltexts.Political Analysis, 21(3), 267-297.https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mps028
Grimshaw, A., & Ravetz, A. (2015). Observational cinema: Anthropology, film, and the exploration of social life. Indiana University Press. https://iupress.org/9780253221582/observational-cinema/
Groenland, E. (2014), Employing the Matrix Method as a Tool for the Analysis of Qualitative Research Data in the Business Domain (September 12, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2495330 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2495330
Grondin, J. (1994). Introduction to philosophical hermeneutics (p. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-05969-8.https://dokumen.pub/introduction-to-philosophical-hermeneutics-9780300156904.html
Guber, R. (2005). El salvaje metropolitano: Reconstrucción del conocimiento social en el trabajo de campo. Paidós.http://www.derechoshumanos.unlp.edu.ar/assets/files/documentos/el-salvaje-metropolitano.pdf
Guber, R. (2011). La etnografía: Método, campo y reflexividad (2.ª ed.). Siglo XXI Editores.https://antroporecursos.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/guber-r-2001- la-etnografia.pdf
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903 (Original work published 2006)
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/applied-thematic-analysis/toc#_
Hafer, J. A. (2022). Developing the theory of pragmatic public management: A grounded theory study. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 627–644. https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/facpubs/18234/
Hair, J. F., Page, M. J., & Brunsveld, N. (2020). Essentials of business research methods (4th ed.). Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203374
Hall, C. S., & Van de Castle, R. L. (1966). The Content Analysis of Dreams (pp. 1–16). Appleton-Century-Crofts.https://catalog.nlm.nih.gov/discovery/fulldisplay/alma99553363406676/01NLM_INST:01NLM_INST
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315146027
Harvard Business School. (2021). What the Case Study Method Really Teaches. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/12/what-the-case-study-method-really-teaches
Hautz, J., Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2017). Open Strategy: Dimensions, Dilemmas, Dynamics. Long Range Planning, 50(3), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.12.001
Headland, T. N., Pike, K. L., & Harris, M. (Eds.). (1990). Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Sage Publications.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-98964-000
Heidegger, M. (1927). Ser y Tiempo.Consultado el 20251107, de: https://archive.org/details/heidegger-martin.-ser-y-tiempo-1927
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row. (Original work published 1927, p. H125). https://altair.pw/pub/lib/Martin%20Heidegger%20%20Being%20and%20Time%20(translated%20by%20Macquarrie%20&%20Robinson).pdf
Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough? How Many Interviews Are Enough? Qualitative Health Research. 2016;27(4):591-608. doi:10.1177/1049732316665344
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AIED-Book-Excerpt-CCR.pdf
Hou, Y., & Huang, J. (2025). Natural language processing for social science research: A comprehensive review. Chinese Journal of Sociology, 11(1), 121-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X241306780
Hodder, I. (1994). The interpretation of documents and material culture (p. 155). Sage. ISBN 978-0761926870. https://philarchive.org/archive/LAYICA
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities (pp. 14– 93, Tabla 2-1, p. 26). Addison-Wesley.https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Content-Analysis-for-the-Social-Sciences-andHolsti/45a5406004332bc048804d21d3532491dc91843f
Huang H, Jefferson ER, Gotink M, Sinclair C, Mercer SW, Guthrie B. Collaborative improvement in Scottish GP clusters after the Quality and Outcomes Framework: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Aug 26;71(710):e719-e727. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.1101. PMID: 33798092; PMCID: PMC8321438. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8321438/
Huizenga, J. (2025). A reflective analysis on collaborative research with older adults: Implications for participatory action research. Qualitative Inquiry, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251394256
International Institute for Hermeneutics. (s.f.). About hermeneutics. Consultado el 20251105, de: https://www.iih-hermeneutics.org/
Is, S., & Farrell, E. (2010). Qualitative methods can enrich quantitative research on occupational stress: An example from an occupational group. In D. C. Ganster & P. L. Perrewé (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being, Vol. 8: New developments in theoretical and conceptual approaches to job stress (pp.137–197). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3555(2010)0000008007
Itu, M. (2007). The hermeneutics of the myth Lumină lină. Gracious Light, (3), 33–49. New York, NY.
Jayathilaka, A. (2021). Ethnography and organizational ethnography: Research methodology. Open Journal of Business and Management, 9(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.91005
James, P. (2006). Globalism, nationalism, tribalism: Bringing theory back in. London, England: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217603
James, P., Nadarajah, Y., Haive, K., & Stead, V. (2012). Sustainable communities, sustainable development: Other paths for Papua New Guinea. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai Press. https://uhpress.hawaii.edu/title/sustainable-communities-sustainable-development-other-paths-for-papua-new-guinea/
Jitdorn, J., et al. (2024). Participatory action research for developing a wellness program in a community setting. International Journal of Business and Society, 25(2), 345-362. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/268421
Kaiser, W. C., & Silva, M. (2007). An introduction to biblical hermeneutics: The search for meaning (Rev. ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. https://www.obinfonet.ro/docs/herm/hermex/Introduction%20to%20Biblical%20Hermeneutics%20The%20Search%20for%20Meaning%20%28Walter%20C.%20Kaiser%2C%20Jr.%2C%20Mois%C3%A9s%20Silva%29%20%28Z-Library%29.pdf
Kassier, L. Identifying transitions in corporate sustainability reporting: a content analysis of JSE/FTSE multinational sustainability reports from 2016 to 2021. Int J Corporate Soc Responsibility 9, 12 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-024-00099-7
Kelle, U. (2005). ¿«Emergencia» o «imposición» de datos empíricos? Un problema crucial de la «teoría fundamentada» reconsiderado. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research , 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs6.2.467
Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Wadsworth. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=230631
Ketokivi, M. (2021). What warrants our claims? Methodological evaluation of warrants in management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(4), 465–479. https://www.cbs.dk/files/cbs.dk/j_of_ops_management_-_2021_-_ketokivi__what_warrants_our_claims_a_methodological_evaluation_of_argument_structure_1_0.pdf
Kidder, L., & Bien, M. (1987). Métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos: cuando las historias convergen. Nuevas direcciones para la evaluación de programas, (35), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1459
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (2021). Diseño de la indagación social: Inferencia científica en la investigación cualitativa (nueva ed.). Princeton University Press. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/El_dise%C3%B1o_de_la_investigaci%C 3%B3n_social.html?id=WkYM-ZN6kacC&redir_esc=y
King, N., & Brooks, J. (2016). Template analysis for business and management students. Sage. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/preview/template-analysis-for-business-and-management-students.pdf#_
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0033-295X.85.5.363
Kottak, C. P. (2015). Cultural anthropology: Appreciating cultural diversity (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://teoriasdelaculturacea.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/kottak_2011_antropologia_cultural.pdf
Kracauer, S. (1952). The challenge of qualitative content analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 16(4, Special Issue on International Communications Research), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1086/266427
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2.ª ed., p. 413). Sage Publications. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Content_Analysis.html?id=q657o3M3C8cC&redir_esc=y
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/book/focus-groups-6
Kurdoglu, R. S., & Kayral, I. H. (2021). Using argumentation theory to analyse verbal interactions in organisations. Business & Management Studies, 9(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v9i1.1732
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/interviews/book239402
Lacy, S. R., & Riffe, D. (1993). Sins of Omission and Commission in Mass Communication Quantitative Research. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 126- 132. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000114
Lasswell, H. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. En L. Bryson (Ed.), The communication of ideas (p. 216). Harper & Row. https://sipa.jlu.edu.cn/__local/E/39/71/4CE63D3C04A10B5795F0108EBE6_A7BC17AA_34AAE.pdf
Lavanchy, M., Reichert, P., Narayanan, J. et al. Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures. J Bus Ethics 188, 125–150 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05320-w
Lazar, M. M. (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis: Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.https://www.ais-sociologia.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Lazar-Feminist-Critical-Discourse-Analysis.pdf
Lee, J. H., Kim, Y. G., & Yu, S. H. (2001). Stage model for knowledge management. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Article 352). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2001.927103
Leidecker-Sandmann, M. (2021). Personalization (Election Campaign Coverage). DOCA - Database of Variables for Content Analysis. https://doi.org/10.34778/2g
LeVine, P., & Scollon, R. (Eds.). (2004). Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis. Georgetown University Press.https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Discourse_and_Technology.html?id=Ekl _4xQzohwC&redir_esc=y
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1958). Antropología estructural (M. Ruiz-Giménez, Trad.). Paidós. https://monoskop.org/images/6/67/Levi-Strauss_Claude_Antropologia_estructural_1978.pdf
Lewiński, M., & Mohammed, D. (2016). Argumentation theory. In K. B. Jensen, R. T. Craig, J. D. Pooley, & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (pp. 1–15). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect198
Lewiński, M., & Mohammed, D. (2020). Argumentation in Political Deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2(1):1-9. https://philpapers.org/rec/LEWAIP
Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195540758 https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=591757
Lin, J. C., Lokhande, A., Margo, C. E., & Greenberg, P. B. (2022). Best practices for interviewing applicants for medical school admissions: a systematic review. Perspectives on Medical Education, 11, 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-022-00726-8
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1995). Criteria for rigor in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/107780049500100301
Linder LA, Seitz M. (2017) Through Their Words: Sources of Bother for Hospitalized Children and Adolescents With Cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs.;34(1):51-64. doi: 10.1177/1043454216631308. Epub 2016 Jul 7. PMID: 26902500
Lippi, M., & Torroni, P. (2016). Argumentation mining: State of the art and emerging trends. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 16(2), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2850417
Lischka, J. A. (2022). Content analysis in the research field of corporate communication. In Standardized Content Analysis in Communication Research (pp. 349–361). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36179-2_30
Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting thematic analysis with qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029-2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008
Locke, L. F. (1987). Propuestas que funcionan: Una guía para la planificación de tesis y propuestas de subvención. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. https://books.google.co.cr/books?id=ebEgAQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_book_other_versions_r&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations.CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
Low, J. (2019). Una definición pragmática del concepto de saturación teórica. Sociological Focus, 52(2), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544514
Lowe, A., Norris, A. C., Farris, A. J., & Babbage, D. R. (2018). Quantifying Thematic Saturation in Qualitative Data Analysis. Field Methods, 30(3), 191- 207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X17749386 (Original work published 2018)
Makri, C., & Neely, A. (2021). Grounded theory: A guide for exploratory studies in management research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, Article 16094069211013654. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211013654
Malhotra, N. K. (2019). Marketing research: An applied orientation (7th ed.). Pearson Education
https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781292265919_A37749261/preview-9781292265919_A37749261.pdf
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. Routledge. https://monoskop.org/images/4/41/Malinowski_Bronislaw_Argonauts_of_the_Western_Pacific_2002.pdf
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research. 2015;26(13):1753-1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
Mak, A. K. Y., & Huang, Z. (2024). Communicating and managing aspirational talk-action tensions: An integrated approach of CSR discourse analysis. Public Relations Review, 50(4), 102479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102479
Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded Theory and Organizational Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200207 (Original work published 1986)
Martínez, M. (2008). La investigación cualitativa etnográfica en educación: Manual teórico-práctico. Trillas. https://profeinfo.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/investigacion-cualitativa-etnografica-martinez.pdf<
Mazzei, A., Kim, J.-N., & Dell’Oro, C. (2020). CEO communication during organizational change: Effects on employees’ uncertainty and organizational trust.Public Relations Review, 46(3), 101–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2011.634869
McDonald, B., & Walker, R. (1977). Case studies in educational research. University of Nottingham. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/31822/1/MacDonald-1975Case_Study_and_the_Social_Philosophy_of_Education_Research.pdf
Medrano, F. (2024). Exploring Ethnographic Approaches in Management Research: Understanding Organizational Dynamics. Journal of Research in International Business and Management Vol. 11(2) pp. 01-02, April https://www.interesjournals.org/articles/exploring-ethnographic-approaches-in-management-research-understanding-organizational-dynamics.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Mejía-Trejo, J. (2025). Innovando la ciudadanía sostenible en inteligencia artificial: un estudio cualitativo del modelo CAITIZEN usando ATLAS.ti. Scientia Et PRAXIS, 5(10), 126–153. https://doi.org/10.55965/setp.5.10.a5
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674237827
Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.6060
Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/491779
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass. https://archive.org/details/casestudyresearc0000merr
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Análisis de datos cualitativos: Una guía ampliada. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. ISBN 978-0-8039-5540-0. https://vivauniversity.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/milesandhuberman1994.pdf
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf
Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500103
Mirzaei, S., & Shokouhyar, S. (2022). Applying a thematic analysis in identifying the role of circular economy in sustainable supply chain practices. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 4691-4722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02217-6
Mishra SP, Mohanty B . (2022). Approaches to strategy formulations: A content analysis of definitions of strategy. Journal of Management & Organization.2022;28(6):1133-1160. doi:10.1017/jmo.2019.86
Monteiro, M., Rosa, A., Martins, A., & Jayantilal, S. (2023). Grounded theory—An illustrative application in the Portuguese footwear industry. Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020059
Morse JM. "Perfectly Healthy, but Dead": The Myth of Inter-Rater Reliability. Qualitative Health Research. 1997;7(4):445-447. doi:10.1177/104973239700700401
Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553253
Moules, N. J., Field, J. C., et al. (2021). Conducting hermeneutic research: From philosophy to practice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–10. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1118286
Muhr, T. (1991). ATLAS/ti – A prototype for the support of text interpretation. Qualitative Sociology, 14(4), 349–371. Muhr, T. (1991). ATLAS/ti — A prototype for the support of text interpretation. Qualitative Sociology, 14(4), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00989645
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). International test commission guidelines for test adaptation: Second edition. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Naeem, M. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789
Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). Guía de análisis de contenido. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4129-7947-4.https://books.google.es/books?id=dqPZAAAAMAAJ&hl=es&source=gbs_book_other_versions_r&cad=1
Nicmanis, M. (2024). Reflexive Content Analysis: An Approach to Qualitative Data Analysis, Reduction, and Description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241236603 (Original work published 2024)
OECD. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Society. https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en
Oehmer-Pedrazzi, F., Kessler, S., Humprecht, E., Sommer, K., & Castro Herrero, L. (2022). DOCA – Database of categories for content analysis. https://www.hope.uzh.ch/doca
Oleinik, A., Popova, I., Kirdina, S. et al. (2014)On the choice of measures of reliability and validity in the content-analysis of texts. Qual Quant 48, 2703–2718 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9919-0
Oliver, C. (2012). Critical realist grounded theory: A new approach for social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 42(2), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr064
Ong, M. G. (2019). Who cares? The dilemma of carework in older Filipina migrants’ narratives. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 50(2), 200–225. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.50.2.006
Østergaard, L. D. (2022). Phenomenology and hermeneutics in qualitative research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(4), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2021.1959392
Oswald, S. (2023). The pragmatics and argumentation interface. Languages, 8(2), 210. https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/8/3/210
Ozuem, W., Willis, M., & Howell, K. (2022). Thematic analysis without paradox: Sensemaking and context. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 25(1), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2021-0092
Packer, M. (2010). The science of qualitative research. Cambridge University Press.https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/La_ciencia_de_la_investigaci%C3%B3n_cualitat.html?id=1kiyDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Parker, L. D., & Roffey, B. H. (1997). Methodological themes: Back to the drawing board—revisiting grounded theory and the everyday accountant’s and manager’s reality. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(2), 212-247.https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579710166730
Pêcheux, M. (1984). Sur les contextes épistémologiques de l’AD. Mots, (9), 5–18. https://www.persee.fr/doc/mots_0243-6450_1984_num_9_1_1160
Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302. Reimpreso en Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5, pp. 388–410) y en The Essential Peirce (Vol. 1, pp. 124–141). https://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/Peirce%201878%20Make%20Ideas%20Clear.pdf
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (2019). Tratado de la argumentación: La nueva retórica (J. Sevilla, Trad.). Gredos. https://gc.scalahed.com/recursos/files/r161r/w24182w/perelman_tratado_argumentacion.pdf
Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Doing_Visual_Ethnography.html?id=kGouAgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Popper, K. R. (1963). Science: Conjectures and refutations. In K. R. Popper (Ed.), Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (pp. 33–65). New York, NY: Basic Books. https://errorstatistics.com/wp content/uploads/2014/02/popper_crrot.pdf
Portal ATLAS.ti. https://atlasti.com/es/
Ralph, N., Birks, M., & Chapman, Y. (2015). The Methodological Dynamism of Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915611576
Rashid, Y., Rashid, A., Warraich, M. A., Sabir, S. S., & Waseem, A. (2019). Case study method: A step-by-step guide for business researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862424
Reese, W. L. (1980). Dictionary of philosophy and religion (p. 221). Sussex, England: Harvester Press. ISBN 0855271477.https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofphil00will
Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 633–652). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=102032
Reinsel, D., Gantz, J., & Rydning, J. (2017, abril). Data Age 2025: The evolution of data to life-critical. Don’t focus on Big Data; focus on the data that’s big [White paper]. International Data Corporation (IDC); Seagate Technology plc. https://www.seagate.com/files/www-content/our-story/trends/files/Seagate-WP-DataAge2025-March-2017.pdf
Reinsel, D., Gantz, J., Rydning, J. (2018). The Digitization of the World From Edge to Core. IDC. https://www.seagate.com/files/www-content/our-story/trends/files/idc-seagate- dataage- whitepaper.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2013). Readme first for a user’s guide to qualitative methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802795
Ricoeur, P. (1969). Essais d’herméneutique. Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil. https://www.persee.fr/doc/ether_0014-2239_1971_num_46_1_1926_t1_0103_0000_2
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage Publications, Inc.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-05683-000
Ripoll López, S., & Muñoz Ibáñez, F. J. (2002). Economía, sociedad e ideología de los cazadores-recolectores (1.ª ed.). Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. https://www.amazon.com.mx/ECONOM%C3%8DA-SOCIEDAD-IDEOLOG%C3%8DA-LOSCAZADORES-RECOLECTORES/dp/843624771X
Rockwell, E. (2009). La experiencia etnográfica: Historia y cultura en los procesos educativos. Paidós. https://tamawasilcov.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/la-experiencia-etnografica.pdf
Rothbard, M. N. (1989). La invasión hermenéutica [Traducido de “The hermeneutical invasion,” The Review of Austrian Economics, 3, 45–59]. https://www.mises.org.es/2014/04/la-invasion-hermeneutica/
Russell, B. (2013). Psychedelic ethnography: A methodology. Entrevista en BIEFF the Blog https://es.hispanopedia.com/wiki/Etnograf%C3%ADa
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243 ResearchGate+2mpi.nl+2
Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (p. 13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.https://www.ajqr.org/download/the-coding-manual-for-qualitative-researchers-12085.pdf
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.https://www.ajqr.org/download/the-coding-manual-for-qualitative-researchers-12085.pdf
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716573
Salgado Andrade, E. (2019). Los estudios del discurso en las ciencias sociales. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9126350
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334-340. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10940958/
Sandelowski, M., & Leeman, J. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22 (10), 1404–1413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312450368
Santiago-Guervos, L.E. (s.f.). La hermenéutica metódica de Friedrich Schleiermacher. Otros Locos, Revista de Estudios Críticos. Consultado el 20251105, de:https://www.ceapedi.com.ar/otroslogos/Revistas/0003/09.%20De%20Guervos.pdf
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. London & New York:Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003377986
Schiffrin, D. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001926 Cambridge University Press & Assessment+1
Shacklett, M. (2023). Datos estructurados vs. no estructurados: Diferencias clave. https://www.datamation.com/big-data/structured-vs-unstructured-data/
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin. https://iaes.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/pdf/147.pdf
Silver, C., & Woolf, N. H. (2023). Qualitative analysis using ATLAS.ti: The five-level QDA method. Routledge.https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003197892
Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/2017_silverman_doing__qualitative_research_book.pdf
Simply Psychology. (2023). Case Study Method in Psychology. Recuperado de https://www.simplypsychology.org/case-study.html
Sladjana Nørskov, Malene Flensborg Damholdt, John Parm Ulhøi, Morten BergJensen, Mia Krogager Mathiasen, Charles M. Ess, Johanna Seibt. (2022). Employers’ and applicants’ fairness perceptions in job interviews: robot-mediated versus face-to-face. Journal of Business Research, 144, 668-678. https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/employers-and-applicants-fairness-perceptions-in-job-interviews-u/
Smit, B. (2002). Atlas.ti for qualitative data analysis. University of Pretoria Repository. https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstreams/4a9f05fa-bf5f-4d3f-ab90-4e9485aab9a0/content
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. https://cpb-use1.wpmucdn.com/blogs.uoregon.edu/dist/e/14077/files/2017/01/spradley-participant_observation-2cg3cpu.pdf
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press. https://www.waveland.com/browse.php?t=689
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97834-000
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. SAGE. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/exploratory-research-in-the-social-sciences/toc#_
Stol, K. J., Ralph, P., & Fitzgerald, B. (2016). Grounded theory in software engineering research: A critical review and guidelines. In Proceedings – 2016 IEEE/ACM 38th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE 2016) (pp. 120-131). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884833
Schmidt, M. (2008).The Sankey diagram in energy and material flow management.Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00004.x
Schoeneborn, D., & Vásquez, C. (2020). The communicative constitution of organization. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 160–207. DOI:10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc030
Schonfeld, I. S., & Mazzola, J. J. (2013). Strengths and limitations of qualitative approaches in occupational health psychology research. In R. R. Sinclair, M. Wang, & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Research methods in occupational health psychology: Measurement, design, and data analysis (pp. 268–289). New York, NY: Routledge. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-25946-016
Spindler, G., & Spindler, L. (1992). Cultural process and ethnography: An anthropological perspective. Academic Press. https://www.depts.ttu.edu/education/our-people/Faculty/additional_pages/duemer/epsy_6304_class_materials/Cultural-process-and-ethnography.pdf
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=ApGdBx76b9kC&printsec=frontcover&rediresc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Strauss, A., y Corbin, JM (1990). Fundamentos de la investigación cualitativa: Procedimientos y técnicas de la teoría fundamentada. Sage Publications, Inc. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-98829-000
Strauss, A. L. (1996). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842
Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving models of language (pp. 100–116). British Association for Applied Linguistics / Multilingual Matters. https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.stubbs/articles/stubbs-1997-whorfs-children.pdf
Suddick, K., Cross, V., Vuoskoski, P., Galvin, K. T., & Stew, G. (2020). The work of hermeneutic phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920947600
Sumpter, R. S. (2001). News about News: John G. Speed and the First Newspaper Content Analysis. Journalism History, 27(2), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00947679.2001.12062572
Tamayo y Tamayo, M. (1999). Aprender a investigar.https://academia.utp.edu.co/grupobasicoclinicayaplicadas/files/2013/06/2.-La-Investigaci%C3%B3n-APRENDER-A-INVESTIGAR-ICFES.pdf
Taylor, B. C., Barley, W. C., Brummans, B. H. J. M., Ellingson, L. L., Ganesh, S., Herrmann, A. F., Rice, R. M., & Tracy, S. J. (2021). Revisiting ethnography in organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(4), 623-652. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189211026700
Thistoll, T., Hooper, V. & Pauleen, D.J. Acquiring and developing theoretical sensitivity through undertaking a grounded preliminary literature review. Qual Quant 50, 619–636 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0167-3
Thomas, G., & James, D. (2006). Reinventing grounded theory: Some questions about theory, ground and discovery. British Educational Research Journal, 32(6), 767–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600989412
Thornberg, R. (2011). Informed Grounded Theory. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.581686
Tian, W., & Dumlao, R. P. (2020). Impacts of Positioning, Power, and Resistance on EFL Learners’ Identity Construction through Classroom Interaction: A Perspective from Critical Classroom Discourse Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 25(6), 1436-1460.https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4161
Tiitola, V., Jalonen, T., Rantanen-Flores, M., Korhonen, T., Ruusuvuori, J., & Laine, T. (2024). Discourse analysis on sustaining the maieutic role “when management accounting goes digital”. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 21(2), 140–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-11-2022-0198
Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914 (Original work published 2012)
Tindale, C. W. (2015). The philosophy of argument and audience reception. Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97811071/01111/frontmatter/9781107101111_frontm atter.pdf
Tipaldo, G. (2014). L'analisi del contenuto e i mass media (p. 42). Il Mulino. https://www.amazon.it/Lanalisi-contenuto-media-Oggetti-strumenti/dp/8815248323
Tolhurst, E. (2012). Grounded theory method: The search for the social of health. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(3), Article 26.https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/download/1860/3432?inline=1
Trappes-Lomax, H. (2004). Discourse analysis. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 133–164). Blackwell Publishing. https://coehuman.uodiyala.edu.iq/uploads/Coehuman%20library%20pdf/English%20library%D9%83%D8%AA%D8%A8%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%83%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B2%D9%8A/linguistics/Davies%20-Elder%20(eds)%20-%20The.Handbook.of.Applied.Linguistics.pdf
Tusón Valls, A. (1997). Análisis de la conversación. Ariel.https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/An%C3%A1lisis_de_la_conversaci%C3%B3n.html?hl=es&id=oLgPBxLF58C&redir_esc=y
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/guidance-generative-ai-education-and-research
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389
van Eemeren, F. H. & Garssen, B. (2019). Argumentation in actual practice. Springer. https://dokumen.pub/argumentation-in-actual-practice-topical-studies-about-argumentative-discourse-in-context-9027204020-9789027204028.html
van Dijk, T. A. (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 352–371). Blackwel https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=821981
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2887822
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Cincuenta años de estudios del discurso. Discurso & Sociedad, 9(1), 15–42. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5409933
van Manen, M. (2023). Phenomenology in its original sense and hermeneutics. Qualitative Health Research, 33(5), 315–327.https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221149915
Verschueren, J. (2016). Humanities and the public sphere: A pragmatic perspective. Pragmatics & Society, 7(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.1.06verResearchGate+1
Walton, D. N. (2007). Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619311
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2.ª ed.). Sage. https://www.daneshnamehicsa.ir/userfiles/files/1/9- %20Basic%20Content%20Analysis,%201990,%20Sage%20Publications.pdf
Webber, B., Egg, M., & Kordoni, V. (2011). Discourse structure and language technology. Natural Language Engineering, 18(4), 437-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324911000337
Wertz, F. J., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry (1st ed.). The Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Five-Ways-of-Doing-Qualitative-Analysis/Wertz-Charmaz-McMullenJosselson/9781609181420?srsltid=AfmBOooZHQCNM_kRzgish4TW8WYWgvkBBrYniSlNdaOxCysVGiTEeqex
Wheldon, C. (2025). AI-empowered qualitative data analysis. CommonHealth Journal, 3(1), 1-12. https://tuljournals.temple.edu/index.php/commonhealth/article/view/770
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0053
Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263561029_Ruth_Wodak_The_Discourse_of_Politics_in_Action_Politics_as_Usual
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse studies. Sage Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1108142
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://research.wu.ac.at/en/publications/methods-of-critical-discourse-studies-3/
Wolcott, H. F. (2008). Ethnography: A way of seeing (2nd ed.). AltaMira Press. https://www.qualitative research.net/index.php/fqs/article/download/690/1490?inline=1
Wulf, T., Possler, D., & Breuer, J. (2021). Sexualization (video games). DOCA –Database of Variables for Content Analysis.https://www.hope.uzh.ch/doca/article/view/2654
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2102
Yin, R.K. (1994).Research Design and Methods. 3rd ed.SAGE. https://iwansuharyanto.wordpress.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/04/robert_k-_yin_case_study_research_design_and_mebookfi-org.pdf
Yin, R.K.(2017). Case Study Research and Applications (6th ed). SAGE Publications, https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/bo
Descargas
Publicado
enero 9, 2026
Colección
Categorías
Derechos de autor 2025 Juan Mejía-Trejo
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Detalles sobre esta monografía
ISBN-13 (15)
978-607-69341-1-1
doi
10.55965/abib.9786076934111
